To me, "happy violence" is violence, whether it be in TV or film, that is highly stylized and lacks real consequences. In some ways, it is even light-hearted and does not hold the weight of actual violence. It is violent for the sake of being entertaining, and it works. In the 2000 film "American Psycho", the main character is a rich, white-collared serial killer. The film is a dark comedy that features several scenes of Christian Bale committing horrendous acts, but it depicted in a way that we root for him and laugh as he hacks, slashes, and eats people throughout the movie.
![]() |
Christian Bale hacks Jared Leto to death in a comedic scene from American Psycho (2000) |
No stranger to the "happy violence" is Quentin Tarantino. Tarantino is one of the most famous and celebrated directors of our time, and he features countless amounts of violent scenes throughout his movies. One of his best films, "Inglorious Basterds", deals with a team of Jewish-American soldiers fighting Nazis in WWII. The movie features many scenes of "happy violence" where Nazis are killed. Now, no sympathy should be granted to Nazis, but it's easy to point out that the violence is meant to be entertaining and comedic. In this scene, a soldier beats a German officer to death while the characters around him cheer and laugh. A great scene nonetheless, but an example of Tarantino's stylized "happy violence".

In the final act, They even kill Hitler in one of the funniest scenes of the movie. He is repeatedly shot in the face and while it is very graphic, we don't care because it is Hitler being killed.

Adrian,
ReplyDeleteI think your examples of happy violence are great. I too enjoy Tarantino's films and did not realize that a lot of the killings are somewhat justified because the audience perceives the subject as a villain (in his film's specifically). I think a lot of people are attracted to his films because they are highly saturated with fantasy violence, not to mention great story lines.